Indices first interrogates the current global standards for monitoring desertification. Governed by organisations such as UNCCD and WAD, the logic behind their works imposes a form of administrative flattening which overshadows the nuances necessary to informing actions in arid and semi-arid territories. A case study on the TNSFP is used to demonstrate how the prioritisation of optical legibility, particularly through vegetation index-derived metrics, harms the landscapes they intend to restore, particularly in arid and semi-arid conditions. In pursuit of the green pixel, the interventions manufactured ‘Green Deserts’, biological infrastructures catered to the metrics which lack the robustness of species diversity and overlooking the imbalances they cause in the hydrological cycles. This results in the emergence of saline dead zones (solonchaks) in some areas, desiccated biocrusts and groundwater losses in others, rather ironically contributing to anthropogenic desertification.
Cycles thus takes a step back, distinguishing between the primary (geological) deserts and the secondary (anthropogenic) deserts and desertification. Current practices miss out on the distinction as it does not stand out in standard metrics, but it is crucial to distinguish the two. Indiscriminately creating green pixels runs the risk of disrupting stable geological deserts, worsening the effects of desertification (e.g. increased dust events), as does simply treating desert lands as resource-rich voids to fill with other extractive industrial activities (e.g. solar farms, mineral mines). Analysing these territories through six cycles (Pedological, Aeolian, Hydrological, Ecological, Radiative, and Social) establishes a way to read the desert, not as a barren void, but as a vibrant entities with its own unique nuances. From this, a Metabolic Ledger is created as a basis for distinguishing the stable geological deserts from the degrading anthropogenic ones, both for assisting in locating potential  patches for monitoring and interventions, and as a tool for follow-up monitoring. 
In Fluxes, a Multiscalar Framework is developed from this Ledger. While satellites track broad, seasonal to decadal trends, the critical nuances present in the ecotone - the fragile boundary between the geological desert and its neighbouring biomes - tend to escape their monitoring, both spatially and temporally. To fill these sub-pixel gaps, then, the framework proposes the deployment of mobile, responsive devices forming part of the ground sensor-actor networks, triggered by satellite-level alerts. Thus the technosphere is transformed from a passive observer into an active participant in the desert’s rhythms.
Shifting away from the enforcement of static boundaries and the logic of discrete states and redefining desertification as a complex, accelerated metabolic shift allows the development of a framework for rhythmic, precise interventions instead of blanket, prescriptive actions. Data, here, is more than a tool for administrative reportings; it is a medium through which we can negotiate a new threshold with the desert. By perceiving the inherent pulse of the territory, future projects can thus engage with these cycles of the lands instead of suppressing them.
INTRODUCTION     INDICES     CYCLES     FLUXES     OVERVIEW
Back to Top